Akeva L.L.C. v. Mizuno Corp.
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ELIASON, United States Magistrate Judge.
The matter before the Court is an increasingly familiar one in patent litigation. Plaintiff Akeva L.L.C. (“Akeva”) alleges defendants Mizuno Corporation and Mizu-no USA, Inc. (“Mizuno”) have infringed two patents covering athletic shoes containing flexible plates in the heel in order to improve cushioning and stability. Defendants deny infringement, but should they lose on the issue, they contend any infringement was not willful because they relied on advice of counsel. Consequently, plaintiff wants defendants to reveal all the attorney opinions…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Underwater Devices Incorporated v. Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc., Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc. v. Lester A. Haug, Don W. Schmid and Herman GuntherCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Festo Corporation v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., Ltd., A/K/A Smc Corporation, and Smc Pneumatics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- George W. Jurgens and Margaret M. Jurgens v. Cbk, Ltd. And Cbk, Ltd., Inc., Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Gustafson, Inc. v. Intersystems Industrial Products, Inc. And Hugo Wenshau, Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re Echostar Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Simmons, Inc. v. Bombardier, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Convolve, Inc. v. Compaq Computer Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Genentech, Inc. v. Insmed IncorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2006
- Sharper Image Corp. v. Honeywell International Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.