Legal Opinion

Gustafson, Inc. v. Intersystems Industrial Products, Inc. And Hugo Wenshau, Defendants/cross-Appellants

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided February 22, 1990No. 89-1383, 89-1410PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARKEY, Chief Judge.

Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, No. CA 3-83-1330-T. The district court determined that Gustafson, Inc.’s (Gustafson’s) United States Patent Nos. 3,383,924 (’924) and 4,443,587 (’587) were not invalid and were willfully infringed by Intersystems Industrial Products, Inc. (Intersystems). The court awarded no damages to Gustafson, permanently enjoined Intersystems from “designing, manufacturing, or selling either its Model PTI sampler or Model PDP sampler,” and awarded Gustafson attorney fees of $113,-220,38.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company v. Phillips Petroleum Company, Phillips 66 Company, and Phillips Driscopipe, Inc., Defendants-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  2. Shatterproof Glass Corporation, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Libbey-Owens Ford Company and Leybold-Heraeus Gmbh, Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  3. Underwater Devices Incorporated v. Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc., Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc. v. Lester A. Haug, Don W. Schmid and Herman GuntherCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  4. Central Soya Company, Inc. v. Geo. A. Hormel & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  5. King Instrument Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Otari Corporation, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Apple Inc. v. Motorola, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  2. Pebble Beach Co. v. Tour 18 I Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  3. Cjc Holdings, Inc., D/B/A Artcarved v. Wright & Lato, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  4. Knorr-Bremse Systeme Fuer Nutzfahrzeuge Gmbh, Plaintiff-Cross v. Dana Corporation, and Haldex Brake Products Corporation, and Haldex Brake Products AbCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  5. Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API