Legal Opinion

Indiana & O. Live Stock Ins. Co. v. Keiningham

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 1, 1913PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRasburv, J.

Defendant in error sued plaintiff in error upon a policy of insurance by which plaintiff in error agreed to pay defendant in error $750 in the event of the death of defendant in error’s horse described in said policy and alleged the death of the horse and the compliance by defendant in error with all provisions of the policy. In answer to the suit plaintiff in error, in addition to general demurrer, special exceptions, and general denial, alleged specially that the horse died at Dallas, where it was being exhibited at the State Fair, for which it was not liable, since the policy was in force…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Goddard v. East Texas Fire InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Aetna Insurance v. HolcombTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Bills v. Hibernia Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  4. McElroy v. British America Assur. Co. of TorontoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899
  5. Phenix Insurance Co. of Brooklyn, New York v. LorenzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Heritage Manor of Blaylock Properties, Inc. v. Petersson, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984
  2. Missouri State Life Ins. Co. v. HearneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy Number 509/QF037603 v. LM Ericsson Telefon, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
  4. Coachmen Industries, Inc. v. Willis of Illinois, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
  5. Robbins v. Reliance Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API