Legal Opinion

Robbins v. Reliance Insurance Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided November 1, 2001No. 13-00-645-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice AMIDEI (Assigned).

Appellant Maurice Robbins, as executor of the estate of Charles M. Robbins, appeals from a summary judgment granted in favor of Reliance Insurance Company, appellee. Appellant’s suit seeks benefits under an accidental death policy.

Appellant’s two issues ask whether the trial court erred, (1) in granting the summary judgment, and (2) in excluding the testimony of Reliance’s corporate representative regarding the underlying insurance policy.

Appellee’s cross-point number one states that appellant’s argument that the 1997 renewal rider is not applicable…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Cincinnati Life Insurance Co. v. CatesTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Cathey v. BoothTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Casso v. BrandTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Friendswood Development Co. v. McDade + Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy Number 509/QF037603 v. LM Ericsson Telefon, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
  2. Hawthorne Savings F.S.B. v. Reliance Insurance Co. of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. Hall v. Michael Bello Insurance Agency, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  4. Hawthorne Savings F.S.B. Hawthorne Financial Corporation v. Reliance Insurance Company of Illinois, Hawthorne Savings F.S.B. Hawthorne Financial Corporation v. M. Diane Koken, Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, in Her Capacity as Liquidator of Reliance Insurance Company, Intervenor-Appellant, Reliance Insurance Company of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. Hawthorne Savings v. Reliance InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API