Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Bryd v. Sherwood

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1942No. 29015 and 29016PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

It is urged on behalf of relator and relatrix that they were permanent civil service employees in the classified service of the state by reason of having been appointed to their several positions from a duly certified list of eligibles, having accepted such appointment and having satisfactorily served more than the 90-day probationary period. It is contended that they had thereby become vested with a tenure of position and office during good behavior and efficient service and could be removed only in the manner provided by statute and only for some cause therein specified.

It is to be observed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davis v. State Ex Rel. KennedyOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Verberg v. Board of Education of the City School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  3. State Ex Rel. Slovensky v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Board of Trustees of Madison County Children's Home v. State Ex Rel. LairdOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  5. State Ex Rel. Hoornstra v. AtkinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Alford v. Willoughby Civil Service CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State ex rel. Hanley v. RobertsOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Glenn v. ChambersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  4. State ex rel. Mikus v. HirbeOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Leiphart Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. BowersOhio Court of Appeals · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API