Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Slovensky v. Taylor

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1939No. 27525PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the 'Court.

Upon examination of the pertinent statutes of Ohio relating to civil service, a majority of the court is of the opinion that one receiving a provisional appointment under Section 486-14, General Code, in the absence of an eligible list, becomes an appointee in the classified service within the contemplation of Section 486-8 (b), General Code, entitled to retain his position during good behavior and efficient service,-until the establishment of an eligible list, or until his services are terminated by arriving at the mandatory retirement age, or until the abolishment of the…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. State, Ex Rel. v. Taylor, Dir.Ohio Supreme Court · 1939
  2. State Ex Rel. Bryd v. SherwoodOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  3. State Ex Rel. Higgins v. GeorgeOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  4. State, Ex Rel. Flittner v. BaldwinOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
  5. State Ex Rel. Boyd v. SchneiderOhio Supreme Court · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API