Legal Opinion
Sorbara v. City of Pittsburgh
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 23, 1984No. Appeal, No. 3017 C.D. 1982PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge MacPhail,
Appellants1 have brought this appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County which quashed their zoning appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
Owen Lavelle (Intervenor), owner of a five acre tract of land fronting Noblestown Road for 516 feet in the 28th ward of the City of Pittsburgh, requested a change in the zoning district classification in order to construct a supermarket. On June 14, 1982, the Council of the City of Pittsburgh approved an ordinance which changed the zoning of Intervenor ’.s tract of land from a limited industrial 'district to a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Knup v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Pittsburgh Outdoor Advertising Co. v. ClairtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Bidwell v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Chul Kim v. Estate of HeinzenroetherCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Township of Reserve v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dunlap v. LarkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Baker v. Chartiers TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Klein v. Council of City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Zoning Board of Adjustment v. Willits Woods AssociatesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- FREMCO Assoc., LLC - Dept. of Revenue of PA UC Audit Div.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.