Legal Opinion

Chul Kim v. Estate of Heinzenroether

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 25, 1978No. Appeal, 2265 C.D. 1977PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

President Judge Bowman,

This particular proceedings is a by-product of a survival action initiated by the executor of the respondent’s estate against the petitioner, Chul Kim, M.D., upon allegation that the petitioner had acted negligently in the treatment of the decedent, Elizabeth G. Heinzenroether, thereby causing her to sustain serious injury to her arm.

The underlying proceedings were initiated pursuant to the provisions of the Health Care Services Malpractice Act (Act), Act of October 15, 1975, P.L. 390, as amended, 40 P.S. §1301.101 et seq., the purpose of which is “to make…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Grime v. Department of Public InstructionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Smethport Area School District v. BowersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Fischer v. KASSABCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Plains Township School District AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Kramer AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Barner v. BD. OF SUPV., S. MIDDLETON T.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Baker v. Chartiers TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Harris v. Oil Service, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Sorbara v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Children's Rehabilitation Center, Inc. v. County of AlleghenyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API