Legal Opinion
Gurary v. Winehouse
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 1, 2001No. 97 Civ. 3803(LLS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
STANTON, District Judge.
This case is here on remand from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which affirmed the dismissal of Mr. Gurary’s federal complaint alleging securities market manipulation in violation of section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the SEC’s Rule 10b-5, Gurary v. Winehouse, 190 F.3d 37 (2d Cir.1999) (Gurary I), and directed the imposition of sanctions with respect to claims predicated on his first two purchases, but not with respect to his remaining two purchases, id. 235 F.3d 792 (2d Cir.2000) (Gurary II).…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gurary v. WinehouseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Mordechai Gurary v. Isaac Winehouse and Isaac Winehouse, Doing Business as Wall & Broad Equities, Nu-Tech Bio-Med, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Simon Debartolo Group, L.P., Gordon Altman Butowsky Weitzen Shalov & Wein v. The Richard E. Jacobs Group, Inc., and New England Development, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Polar International Brokerage Corp. v. HyndmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Inter-County Resources, Inc. v. Medical Resources, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gurary v. Nu-Tech Bio-MedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Gurary v. WinehouseDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003