Gurary v. Winehouse
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
STANTON, District Judge.
This case is here on remand from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for further proceedings consistent with its opinion of August 23, 2002, Gurary v. Nu-Tech Bio-Med, Inc., 303 F.3d 212 (2d Cir.2002). The Court of Appeals held that under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (“PSLRA”) provision for sanctions, 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(c)(3)(A)(ii), plaintiffs counsel, David Jar-oslawicz, Esq., and the firm Jaroslawicz & Jaros (collectively “Jaroslawicz”), are subject to full sanctions, including appellate expenses. It vacated this…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mattie Norman, Clara Marshall, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. The Housing Authority of the City of MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Gurary v. WinehouseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Mordechai Gurary v. Isaac Winehouse and Isaac Winehouse, Doing Business as Wall & Broad Equities, Nu-Tech Bio-Med, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Simon Debartolo Group, L.P., Gordon Altman Butowsky Weitzen Shalov & Wein v. The Richard E. Jacobs Group, Inc., and New England Development, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Joseph Markowitz, Trustee in Reorganization of Bay Point Corporation v. Republic National Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.