Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Anchorage Equal Rights Commission

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 2004No. S-10883, S-10733PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The Alaska Statutes and the Anchorage Municipal Code both prohibit landlords from refusing to rent property to persons because of marital status. 1 Ten years ago, in Swanner v. Anchorage Equal Rights Commission, we held that enforcing these provisions against an Anchorage landlord who refused to rent to unmarried couples on religious grounds did not violate the landlord's right to free exercise of his religion. 2 In the present case, similarly situated landlords urge us to overrule Swanner, insisting that the state and municipal fair housing laws…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. City of Boerne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State v. MataNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. American Civil Liberties UnionAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Alaska Public Interest Research Group v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. In Re Hospitalization of Naomi B.Alaska Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State v. CarlinAlaska Supreme Court · 2011

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API