Legal Opinion

Steunenberg v. National Progressive Life Insurance

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1940No. 30838PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaine, J.

Plaintiff brought suit in equity to cancel an agreement by which she was induced to exchange $15,200 of notes, secured by real estate mortgages, for certificates of stock for the same amount in the Midland National Company. Plaintiff alleges that such agreement was obtained by reason of a conspiracy to defraud her. Plaintiff asks for an accounting, and, if her securities cannot be returned to her, for judgment for the amount due her. Trial court dismissed her petition without prejudice to an action at law to recover damages for fraud.

On March 28, 1935, the plaintiff filed her petition, and on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ashby v. PetersNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Koehler v. DodgeNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Kennedy v. Otoe County National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Horton v. Tabitha HomeNebraska Supreme Court · 1914
  5. A. L. Houghton & Co. v. ToddNebraska Supreme Court · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Draemel v. Rufenacht, Bromagen & Hertz, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America v. Lane Contracting Corp.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1964
  3. Katz v. SUNSET FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2009
  4. Lohrman v. Sunset Financial Services, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API