Legal Opinion
A. L. Houghton & Co. v. Todd
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided March 22, 1899No. 8813PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Error from the district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Hall, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Irvine, C.
About January 30, 1894, a partnership was formed by Ammi B. Todd, James W. Sage, and Charles D. Dundas under the name of the Lincoln Bridge Company, its main *361purpose being the construction of bridges. The agreement provided, among other things, that no material should be purchased or debts contracted without the consent of all the partners. Sage was, however, soon taken ill and the business was in fact conducted by Todd and Dundas. About the same time Dundas entered into a contract with the plaintiffs Houghton & Co., dealers in lumber, with an office in Kansas City and mills in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Allen v. South Boston RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- First National Bank v. GiffordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
3Cited by6 opinions
- Exchange Bank v. Nebraska Underwriters InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
- State ex rel. Davis v. Farmers & Merchants BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
- Union National Bank v. Village of BeemerNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
- Steunenberg v. National Progressive Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
- Maixner v. Travelers InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.