Legal Opinion

Mendota Electric Co. v. New York Indemnity Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 13, 1928No. 26,377PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This case was here before on appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint. There was a reversal, 169 Minn. 377, 211 N. W. 317, since which a trial resulted in a verdict for plaintiff. Defendant moved for a directed verdict and thereafter for judgment notwithstanding. Both motions were denied, judgment was entered on the verdict, and defendant appeals.

Not much restatement of facts is needed. Plaintiff is an electric distributing company and sues on a policy of public liability insurance issued by defendant, the claim being that under the circumstances stated in the former…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mendota Electric Co. v. New York Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. City of Wakefield v. Globe Indemnity Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Abrams v. Factory Mutual Liability InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  3. Henke v. Iowa Home Mutual Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
  4. Olympia Fields Country Club v. Bankers Indemnity InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945
  5. Radcliffe v. Franklin National InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1956

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API