Legal Opinion

Clark v. Russell Corp.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 3, 1995No. 2940053PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Adoris Clark sued Russell Corporation to recover workmen's compensation benefits for an asthma attack she suffered in February 1991; she says her asthma was aggravated by the nature of her employment.1 After receiving ore tenus evidence, the trial court denied benefits. Clark appeals, contending that the trial court erred in its determination of medical causation and in its application of § 25-5-110(1), Ala. Code 1975, which defines "occupational disease."

The standard of appellate review in a workmen's compensation case is (1) whether there is any legal evidence to support the trial court's…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Eastwood Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Ex Parte CashSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. Farris v. St. Vincent's Hosp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  4. Nance v. NanceCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  5. Smith v. Colonial BankCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dan River, Inc. v. HigginsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  2. Herchenhahn v. Amoco Chemical Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  3. Clark v. Russell Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  4. Dan River, Inc. v. HigginsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  5. Ex Parte Parte Russell Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API