Legal Opinion

Smith v. Colonial Bank

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided January 31, 1992No. 2900644PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is the second time that this workmen's compensation case has been before this court. Erma Jean Smith (employee) appealed from the trial court's September 11, 1989, order. This court, after affirming the trial court's finding that the employee did not suffer an injury as a result of an accident, remanded the case for a determination of whether the employee suffered an occupational disease. See Smith v. Colonial Bank,578 So.2d 1364 (Ala.Civ.App. 1991).* On May 24, 1991, the trial court entered an order finding that "there is no evidence or law to support that the Plaintiff suffered an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Eastwood Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Young v. City of HuntsvilleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1976
  3. Smith v. Colonial BankCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  4. Elmore County v. HornsbyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Zeanah v. Stewart Animal Clinic, PCCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  2. Clark v. Russell Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  3. Bruno's, Inc. v. LawsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  4. Herchenhahn v. Amoco Chemical Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  5. Bruno's, Inc. v. LawsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API