Legal Opinion

Clark v. Russell Corp.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 3, 1995No. 2940053Published

1Opinion of the Court

671 So.2d 677 (1995)

Adoris CLARK

v.

RUSSELL CORPORATION.

2940053.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 3, 1995.

Rehearing Denied May 12, 1995.

Wanda J. Batson of Proctor and Vaughn, Sylacauga, for appellant.

Randall S. Haynes of Morris, Haynes, Ingram & Hornsby, Alexander City, for appellee.

YATES, Judge.

Adoris Clark sued Russell Corporation to recover workmen's compensation benefits for an asthma attack she suffered in February 1991; she says her asthma was aggravated by the nature of her employment.[1] After receiving ore tenus evidence, the trial court denied benefits. Clark appeals, contending…

Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Eastwood Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Ex Parte CashSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. Ex Parte VeazeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  4. Farris v. St. Vincent's Hosp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  5. Nance v. NanceCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API