Legal Opinion
Bailey v. Council of the Division of Planning & Development
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided October 29, 1956PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Burling, J.
The factual background of this case is developed in Bailey v. Driscoll, 34 N. J. Super. 228 (App. Div. 1955), reversed 19 N. J. 363 (1955). Plaintiff Bailey owns land which extends out into Barnegat Bay in the Ortley Beach section of Dover Township in Ocean County, New Jersey. The land in question was formerly aii island, westerly of and separated from the mainland by a tidewater creek (known as Muscrat Creek) which originated and terminated in Barnegat Bay, encompassing the island in a semi-circular fashion.
Ocean County then constructed Bay…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- City of Yonkers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
3Cited by15 opinions
- Schultz v. WilsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Board of Education v. State Board of EducationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
- TP. OF CEDAR GROVE v. SheridanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
- Dickinson v. FUND FOR SUPPORT OF FREE PUB. SCH.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- New Jersey Mfrs. Cas. Ins. Co. v. HoldermanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.