Legal Opinion
Schultz v. Wilson
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 26, 1957PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
44 N.J. Super. 591 (1957)
131 A.2d 415
ARTHUR SCHULTZ, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
ROBERT WILSON AND DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, DIVISION OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 22, 1956.
Reargued February 4, 1957.
Decided April 26, 1957.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.
Mr. Robert V. Carton argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Durand, Ivins & Carton, attorneys).
Mr. David D. Furman, Deputy Attorney-General, argued the cause for respondent Division of Planning and…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Martin v. Lessee of WaddellSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Swede v. City of CliftonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Hoboken v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- City of Newark v. Natural Resource Council in the Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- United States v. Stoeco Homes, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Matthews v. Bay Head Improvement Ass'nSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- NJ Sports & Exposition Auth. v. McCraneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
- River Development Corp. v. Liberty Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.