Legal Opinion

Schoenberger v. White

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 30, 1903PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action against husband and wife for goods furnished, brought to the City Court of New Haven and tried to the court, Bishop, J.; judgment for plaintiffs for $200, and appeal by the wife.

1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.

The plaintiffs’ complaint is in the form known in the Practice Book as “ the common counts.” The bill of particulars is against the husband alone, for provisions bought by him to the amount of $197.91. The defendants filed a joint answer. This admitted “ so much of the allegations of plaintiffs’ complaint and bill of particulars that allege $84.86,” and denied the rest; and then set up a tender before suit, by “the defendant,” of $84.86, and that “the defendant ” has been ever willing to pay that sum; and that payments were made by “the defendants,” from time to time, “ on account of . such…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Masterson v. HerndonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Brockett v. Fair Haven & Westville RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
  3. Gaylord v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1822
  4. Zacarino v. PallottiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1881

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chapel-High Corp. v. CavallaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  2. Rowell v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API