Zacarino v. Pallotti
Supreme Court of Connecticut
General assumpsit, brought to the Court of Common Pleas. Facts found by a committee; remonstrance by the plaintiff against the acceptance of the report; report accepted and judgment for the defendant, (Calhoun, J.;') and motion in error by the ¡plaintiff. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtPark, C. J.
Tlie declaration in this case contains only the common counts. The plaintiff filed a bill of particulars, setting forth his claim, which was for money lent and advanced, for. money paid, laid out and expended in goods, wares and merchandise, and for freight on the same, and for work and labor performed.
It appears that on the trial before the committee the plaintiff failed to establish any of these several claims, and the committee found that the defendant was not indebted to the plaintiff on any of them. It further appears, that by way of defence against the plaintiff’s claims, the defendant…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Vila v. WestonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1865
- Guile v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
- Landon v. SageSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1836
- Mitchell v. AllenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
3Cited by7 opinions
- Daytona Bridge Co. v. BondSupreme Court of Florida · 1904
- Cooper v. UptonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
- Farley v. Chase Bank, U.S.A., N.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- McDowell v. NorthIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
- Stewart v. St. Louis & Suburban Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.