Rowell v. Ross
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Action by an attorney at law to recover the reasonable worth of professional services rendered by him, brought to and tried by the Superior Court in Fair-field County, Tuttle, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the plaintiff for $2,883, and appeal by the defendant Ross.
1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.
This case was before us upon the plaintiff’s appeal at the April term, 1913, when a new trial was ordered. 87 Conn. 157, 87 Atl. 355. After the case had thus been remanded to the Superior Court, the pleadings were changed by the filing of separate answers by the defendants, and new issues were thus created by the pleadings. A reference to the report of the case when formerly before us, will obviate the necessity of stating here more than the changed condition of the pleadings.
The plaintiff sues both defendants for his services in collecting a judgment held by the defendant Ross against one…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Nowsky v. SiedleckiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- Rowell v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
- Schoenberger v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
3Cited by13 opinions
- Mary Kicklighter v. Nails by Jannee, Inc., Mary Kicklighter v. Nails by Jannee, Inc., and Third-Party v. Kay-See Dental Manufacturing Co., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Barnett v. JaspanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Chapel-High Corp. v. CavallaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Young v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Standard Co. v. YoungSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.