Legal Opinion

Estate of Gillilan v. Estate of Gillilan

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1980No. 2-477A142PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Presiding Judge.

Shortly before their marriage in 1959, Charles and Mae (Lee) Gillilan entered into an antenuptial agreement in which Charles agreed that if he predeceased Mae, she would receive the entire net income from his estate during the term of her natural life. They lived together as husband and wife until Charles’ death in 1975. The numerous provisions of his will in substance provided Mae with the income from his assets but placed a ceiling on said income, raising the question as to whether or not the antenuptial agreement of the parties was breached. Mae filed her election…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Eaton v. EatonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  2. McNutt v. McNuttIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Kruse, Kruse & Miklosko, Inc. v. BeedyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Moore v. HarrisonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Smeekens v. BertrandIndiana Supreme Court · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of BorenIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Lund v. LundWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Compton v. ComptonAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Economy Leasing Co., Ltd. v. WoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Estate of Lampert Ex Rel. Thurston v. Estate of Lampert Ex Rel. StaufferAlaska Supreme Court · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API