Legal Opinion
Pullen v. Patton
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided May 6, 1937No. 3753-1009 EqPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ATWELL, District Judge.
Complainant is a citizen of Minnesota. He is engaged in a contract to stage an entertainment known as the Pre-Pan-American Marathon, at Dallas, Tex.,, and has spent and contracted to expend large sums of money in that direction. He represents that on the 1st day of May,. 1937, respondent, Patton, as district attornéy, filed in the One Hundred First judicial district court of Texas a bill to restrain W. T. Cox, Ed McLamore, complainant, and Sportatorium, Inc., from operating or continuing the marathon, on the ground that it was a physical contest in violation of article…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ex Parte PoreskySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Terrace v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Fenner v. BoykinSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Spielman Motor Sales Co. v. DodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Tyson & Brother v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Linehan v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953
- Waddell v. Chicago Land Clearance CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
- O'ROURKE v. Waterfront CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954
- Priceman v. DeweyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1949
- Linehan v. Waterfront CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.