Legal Opinion
Linehan v. Waterfront Commission
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 23, 1953PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEINFELD, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, the President and the Secretary-Treasurer of the union individually, and the union bring this action on behalf of themselves and all other individuals and labor organizations similarly situated to restrain the operation and enforcement of § 8, Part III of the recently enacted Waterfront Commission Act of New York State, Laws of 1953, C. 882, § 8, on the ground of constitutional infirmities both under the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of New York. Plaintiffs move to convene a three-judge statutory court pursuant to…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Douglas v. City of JeannetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Ex Parte PoreskySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Linehan v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953
- Applegate v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- International Longshoremen's Association, Afl-Cio v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- International Longshoremen's Ass'n v. Waterfront CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981