R. Dean Harman v. Eva Harper
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CANBY, Circuit Judge:
Defendant Eva Harper appeals an order of the district court correcting an earlier judgment and denying Rule 60(b) relief from that judgment. Insofar as Harper’s appeal challenges the earlier judgment, entered after remand from this court, we dismiss the appeal. To the extent that the judgment challenges the denial of Rule 60(b) relief, we affirm.
FACTS
This action was originally brought by Dean and Lynn Harman against Eva and Brainard Harper, and Harper Realty, Inc. The complaint alleged violations of state and federal securities laws, as well as state-law torts of fraud…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- International Controls Corp. v. Robert L. Vesco, and Vesco & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Federal Trade Commission v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Martha Robi v. Five Platters, Inc., Jean Bennett, and Buck RamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Sebastian Scola v. Boat Frances, R., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- John Garamendi v. Jean-Francois HenninCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Melissia Henson v. Fidelity National FinancialCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Inland Concrete Enterprises, Inc. v. KraftDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2016
- In Re the Marriage of BuckColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
- McCarty v. AstrueDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.