Legal Opinion

Inland Concrete Enterprises, Inc. v. Kraft

District Court, C.D. California

Decided August 24, 2016No. Case No. LA CV 10-01776-VBFPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER Determining that Kraft’s FRCP 60(b)(3) Motion for Relief from June 22, 2011 Judgment is Untimely & Barred By His Failure to Appeal;

Dismissing #271 (Motion for Relief from Judgment) With Prejudice for Lack of Jurisdiction;

Denying #288 (Inland’s Evidentiary Objections)

PRESENT:

HONORABLE VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

This was a diversity action sounding in contract and fraud. In March 2010, Inland Concrete Enterprises Inc. and its Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“Inland ESOP”) and the ESOP’s Trustee (collectively “Inland”) filed the complaint against…

2Cases cited84 opinions

  1. Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  2. Bruce Beaudett v. City of Hampton City Attorneys A. Paul Burton and W. Stephen Moore Judge T.H. Wilson, II and Judge Nelson T. OvertonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  3. Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Wolff v. CaliforniaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2017
  2. Wolff v. CaliforniaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2017
  3. (PC) Daniels v. ShermanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  4. (PC) Luna v. MoonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  5. Allen Bernard Shay v. County of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2021

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API