Legal Opinion

United States v. Tanous

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided July 21, 1966No. 5168Published

1Opinion of the CourtMaetin, Judge

This appeal is from the judgment of the First Division, Appellate Term of the United States Customs Court (52 Cust. Ct. 595, A.R.D. 164). The case involves the reappraisemenit of “Chiclines” brand bubble chewing gum purchased from Chiclera Industrial Mexicana, S.A. (Chiclera), and Impulsora Agricola Industrial, S.A. (Impul-sora), of Mexico City, by Joseph Tanous, the importer. The bubble gum was invoiced and entered at Laredo, Texas, on February 28,1947 at 6.50 pesos per 100 tablets (or per kilo), net, packed, F.O.B., Mexico City (hereinafter referred to as 6.50).2 However, the gum was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. MassinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. International Forwarding Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  3. Pan-American Plywood Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  4. Tanous v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  5. Tanous v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API