Legal Opinion

Tanous v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 21, 1964No. A.R.D. 164; Entry No. 74PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson, Judge:

This is an application for review of a decision and judgment of a single judge in a reappraisement proceeding involving the value of certain bubble gum having the brand name “Chiclines” (50 Cust. Ct. 879, Reap. Dec. 10439), which was purchased from Chiclera Industrial Mexicana, S.A., of Mexico City.

The merchandise was entered at 6.50 Mexican pesos per 100 tablets, plus stamp tax. It was stipulated by counsel that the merchandise had been appraised at 8 pesos per 100 pieces, plus 1.65 per centum Mexican stamp tax, on the basis of export value of similar merchandise, to wit, Ace…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tanous v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. TanousCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API