Legal Opinion

Garcia v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 24, 2004No. 489-03PublishedCited by 141 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · KeaslerKeasler, J.

MEYERS, PRICE, WOMACK, JOHNSON, HERVEY, HOLCOMB, and COCHRAN, JJ.

Jose Medrano Garcia does not speak English. His jury trial had mostly English-speaking witnesses and court personnel, and the proceedings were not translated. He did not affirmatively waive his right to translation and was apparently unaware of that right. We must decide whether Garcia’s conviction violates the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. We conclude that it does.

Facts and Procedural History

Garcia was born in Matehuala, Mexico, and attended school there through the ninth…

3Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Marin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by141 opinions

  1. Balderas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
  2. Linton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  3. David Shane West v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
  4. Patterson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006
  5. Ex Parte Cresencio Zantos-Cuebas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2014

136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API