Legal Opinion

Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. Kirkland

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 7, 2011No. 1091122PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODALL, Justice.

Voris E. Kirkland, Connie Ruth Kirkland, Charles Edward Kirkland II, and Karen Kirkland Ochoa (“the Kirklands”) sued certain underwriters at Lloyd’s; London, subscribing to policy no. CRAL1412 (“Underwriters”), seeking a judgment declaring the priority of their mortgage interests over the mortgage interest Underwriters had acquired pursuant to the mortgage clause of an insurance policy. The trial court entered a summary judgment in the Kirklands’ favor, and Underwriters has appealed. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and render a judgment for Underwriters on certain of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. TWIN CITY FIRE INS. COMPANY v. Alfa Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  2. Continental Nat. Indem. Co. v. FieldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  3. ATTYS. INS. v. Smith, Blocker & Lowther, PCSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  4. AMER. GEN. LIFE AND ACC. INS. v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  5. Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp. v. RossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Booth v. Newport Television, LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  2. Box v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2014
  3. Axis Dynamics v. Knox County TennesseeDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API