Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. Kirkland
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
WOODALL, Justice.
Voris E. Kirkland, Connie Ruth Kirkland, Charles Edward Kirkland II, and Karen Kirkland Ochoa (“the Kirklands”) sued certain underwriters at Lloyd’s; London, subscribing to policy no. CRAL1412 (“Underwriters”), seeking a judgment declaring the priority of their mortgage interests over the mortgage interest Underwriters had acquired pursuant to the mortgage clause of an insurance policy. The trial court entered a summary judgment in the Kirklands’ favor, and Underwriters has appealed. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and render a judgment for Underwriters on certain of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- TWIN CITY FIRE INS. COMPANY v. Alfa Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001
- Continental Nat. Indem. Co. v. FieldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
- ATTYS. INS. v. Smith, Blocker & Lowther, PCSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- AMER. GEN. LIFE AND ACC. INS. v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp. v. RossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Booth v. Newport Television, LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2011
- Box v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2014
- Axis Dynamics v. Knox County TennesseeDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2025