Legal Opinion

ATTYS. INS. v. Smith, Blocker & Lowther, PC

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 3, 1997No. 1950420, 1950511PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Blocker Lowther, P.C. ("Smith, Blocker"), sued Attorneys Insurance Mutual of Alabama, Inc. ("Attorneys Mutual"), its professional liability insurance carrier, seeking a judgment declaring that Attorneys Mutual had a duty to defend and indemnify it in regard to a malpractice claim. Smith, Blocker also sought damages, alleging that Attorneys Mutual had in bad faith refused to provide coverage under the policy. The trial court entered a summary judgment in favor of Smith, Blocker as to the question of the insurance coverage claim and in favor of Attorneys Mutual on the bad faith claim.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Bay Cities Paving & Grading, Inc. v. Lawyers' Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. National SEC. Fire & Cas. Co. v. BowenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  5. Chavers v. National SEC. Fire & Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. TWIN CITY FIRE INS. COMPANY v. Alfa Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  2. Denmark v. Mercantile Stores Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  3. Royal Insurance Company of America, A.K.A. R.E. Grills Construction Co., Inc. v. Whitaker Contracting Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  4. Pritchett v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  5. Celtic Life Ins. Co. v. McLendonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API