Legal Opinion
Kirsch v. Endicott
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided April 18, 1996No. 94-359PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGartzke, P.J.
Kevin Kirsch, Omowale Nubian Black, James Griffin and Dempsie Coburn appeal from a judgment dismissing their action brought against Jeffrey Endicott under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for injunctive relief and damages. The plaintiffs were inmates at the Columbia Correctional Institution (CCI) when Endicott was the warden. The plaintiffs allege in substance that by subjecting them to a "Management Continuum" policy while they were segregated from the general prison population, the warden deprived them of liberty and property without due process of *708law, contrary to the Fourteenth Amendment of the United…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Santiago v. WareCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
- State Ex Rel. Harr v. BergeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
- State v. SteffesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
- Chaney v. RenteriaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
- Kirsch v. EndicottCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.