Legal Opinion

Solano Concrete Co. v. Lund Construction Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 3, 1976No. Civ. 15829PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PARAS, J.

In a wrongful death action, defendant Solano Concrete Company, Inc. (hereinafter “Solano”), filed a cross-complaint requesting a declaration of its asserted right to indemnity from the decedent’s employer, Lund Construction Company (hereinafter “Lund”). The court sustained a demurrer to the cross-complaint without leave to amend on the theory that under Labor Code section 3864 there was no written agreement to indemnify executed prior to the death and that Lund had not waived the benefit of section 3864 by executing a written agreement (hereinafter the “subcontract”) with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re De NeefCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. Record v. Indemnity InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kaiser Engineers, Inc. v. Grinnell Fire Protection Systems Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. Rose v. County of PlumasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. Trustees of Capital Wholesale Electric Co. Profit Sharing & Trust Fund v. Shearson Lehman Bros.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Lockheed Missiles & Space Co. v. Gilmore Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. City of Oakland v. Delcon AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API