Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Rose v. County of Plumas

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 8, 1984No. Civ. 22740PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COUZENS, J. *

Plaintiffs Noel and Velma Rose, husband and wife, appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered in favor of defendants County of Plumas, Sheriff S. Douglas Thomas, and Deputy Sheriffs J. Shaver and R. E. Day (county) after county’s general demurrer to plaintiffs’ first amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend. We shall reverse the judgment.

Facts

According to plaintiffs’ first amended complaint, 1 on June 18, 1981, plaintiffs Noel and Velma Rose were customers of the Plumas Club, a bar in Plumas County, and “were relaxing and enjoying the companionship of other…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Davidson v. City of WestminsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Williams v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Mann v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. State of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lehto v. City of OxnardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. M.B. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Wise v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Lopez v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. MB v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API