Legal Opinion
Bryan v. Eichenwald
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided March 30, 2000No. CIV.A. 99-2543-CMPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
RUSHFELT, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the court is Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion for Protective Order (doc. 21). Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c), plaintiff seeks an order to allow the parties to file under seal all briefing on two discovery motions he intends to file. Defendants have agreed to the requested protective order.
Plaintiff represented defendant Helene Ei-chenwald as her attorney through March 4, 1998. (Compl., doc. 1, ¶ 7.) He alleges that defendant Eichenwald, in the summer of 1999, began to state that he was stalking her, was dangerous, and was likely…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Gulf Oil Co. v. BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Darlene Thomas v. International Business MacHines a New York Corporation Doing Business in the State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Citizens First National Bank of Princeton v. Cincinnati Insurance Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Sentry Insurance v. ShiversDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1996
3Cited by12 opinions
- MGP Ingredients, Inc. v. Mars, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2007
- Shockey v. Huhtamaki, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2012
- Williams v. Sprint/united Management Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2004
- Exum v. United States Olympic CommitteeDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2002
- Hamilton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.