Legal Opinion
Amory v. Boyden Associates, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 6, 1976No. 75 Civ. 6453PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WHITMAN KNAPP, District Judge.
Defendants move to dismiss and for summary judgment pursuant to Rules 12(b) and 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and plaintiff cross-moves for partial summary judgment on the first claim of his complaint. We have determined that neither motion can be granted.. Plaintiff had been employed by defendant Boyden Associates, Inc. (Boyden) for sixteen years when, in July of 1975, he voluntarily resigned to work for another firm. At that time he had accumulated approximately $70,000 in vested benefits in the Boyden Associates, Inc.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Amory H. Bradford v. The New York Times CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Kristt v. WhelanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- Kristt v. WhelanNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
- James Wyper, Jr. v. Providence Washington Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
3Cited by27 opinions
- William J. Riley v. Meba Pension TrustCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Robert S. Fremont and Henry W. Dybal v. McGraw Company, Robert S. Fremont, Ronald L. McCarthy and Henry W. Dybal v. McGraw CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Hollenbeck v. Falstaff Brewing Corp.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1985
- Winer v. Edison Bros. Stores Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- Shaw v. KruidenierDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1979
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.