Dwenger v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
From the St. Joseph Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Bicknell, C. C.
The plaintiff demanded $7,000 as damages for the alleged obstruction of an easement. His complaint alleged that Division street was laid out on the plat of the Bank of Indiana’s addition to South Bend, as forty-nine and one-half feet wide along the front of lot No. 70 j that in 1871, the plaintiff became the owner in fee simple of a part of lot No. 70, known as lots 4 and 5, in E. Sorin’» subdivision of lot No. 70, abutting on the south side of said street for the distance of sixteen rods; that in 1865, said *154street was made sixty-six feet wide; that on said lots 4 and 5 a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cox v. Louisville, New Albany, & Chicago RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Ross v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Cummins v. City of SeymourIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Milburn v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1861
- Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. State ex rel. City of LawrenceburgIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. EberleIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Dantzer v. Indianapolis Union Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. NoftsgerIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Osborn v. SuttonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Meyer v. Town of BoonvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.