Kowalski v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.
While the plaintiff was cleaning the flues of a vertical boiler mounted on a flat car, a rod which he was using contacted with overhead1 wires and he sustained electric burns,‘abrasions, and shock. Compensation for the total incapacity .caused by these injuries was paid under a voluntary agreement. On March 16th, 1931, the compensation commissioner made a finding including the fact that shortly after the plaintiff’s wounds healed and he was discharged from the hospital, “he began to show symptoms of a functional nervous disturbance and these symptoms have persisted to the present time,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hunnewell's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Fair v. Hartford Rubber Works Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Kalinick v. Collins Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Coffey v. Coffey Laundries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Kurzaji v. Warner and BowmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Orlo v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Miller v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
- State v. TedescoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Strazza v. McKittrickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Redfern v. Sparks-Withington Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1958
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.