Legal Opinion

Kowalski v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 14, 1933PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

While the plaintiff was cleaning the flues of a vertical boiler mounted on a flat car, a rod which he was using contacted with overhead1 wires and he sustained electric burns,‘abrasions, and shock. Compensation for the total incapacity .caused by these injuries was paid under a voluntary agreement. On March 16th, 1931, the compensation commissioner made a finding including the fact that shortly after the plaintiff’s wounds healed and he was discharged from the hospital, “he began to show symptoms of a functional nervous disturbance and these symptoms have persisted to the present time,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hunnewell's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  2. Fair v. Hartford Rubber Works Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  3. Kalinick v. Collins Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  4. Coffey v. Coffey Laundries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  5. Kurzaji v. Warner and BowmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Orlo v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
  2. Miller v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. State v. TedescoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  4. Strazza v. McKittrickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  5. Redfern v. Sparks-Withington Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API