Legal Opinion

Coffey v. Coffey Laundries, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 18, 1928PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRnsTMAN, J.

The trial court apparently took no action upon the numerous reasons of appeal from the commissioner having to do with corrections of the finding, but reached its conclusion upon the finding of the commissioner as corrected by him. The appeal to this court is from this decision only, and must be determined upon the operative facts set forth in the commissioner's finding. The claimant was president and general manager of, and a majority stockholder in, the respondent corporation. As such general manager it was his duty to superintend and direct the work in the plant, his duties being in general…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Larke v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  2. Gonier v. Chase Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  3. Madore v. New Departure Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  4. Jacquemin v. Turner & Seymour Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
  5. Marchiatello v. Lynch Realty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1919

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Farmers Gin Co. v. CooperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. Berndt v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Minotte E. Chatfield Co. v. Coffey Laundries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  4. Kowalski v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  5. Funaioli v. City of New LondonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API