Legal Opinion

State v. Pabst

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 11, 2000No. 80,738PublishedCited by 187 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Six, J.:

This is the rare case in which the prosecutor’s improper remarks during closing argument were so prejudicial that a new trial is required. Defendant Tod Alan Pabst appeals his jury conviction for first-degree murder, K.S.A. 21-3401. The conviction arises out of the shooting death of Pabst’s fiancee, Phoebe Harkins. The district court sentenced Pabst to 25 years to life in prison.

Our jurisdiction is under K.S.A. 22-3601(b)(1) (a fife sentence was imposed).

The controlling question is whether Pabst was denied a fair trial by prosecutorial…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. United States v. Gaetano ModicaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by187 opinions

  1. State v. KingSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. State v. ToshSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  3. State v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  4. State v. McCaslinSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  5. State v. ElnickiSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005

182 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API