Legal Opinion

American Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Washington

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 23, 1931PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). The general ground upon which the judgment upon the insurance policy in the justice court is sought to be enjoined and set aside is that it was obtained by fraud. It is the settled law of this State that the fraud which entitles a party to impeach a judgment must be a fraud extrinsic of the matter tried in the case. It must not consist of any false .or fraudulent act or testimony, the truth of which was, or might have been, in issue before the court, which resulted in the judgment that is thus assailed. It must be a fraud practiced upon the court in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Germania Fire Insurance v. BallyArizona Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Bank of Pine Bluff v. LeviSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  3. Arkansas Insurance v. McManusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  4. Guardian Life Insurance v. DixonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  5. H. G. Pugh & Co. v. AhrensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Aluminum Co. of America v. HenningSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  2. United States Ex Rel. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. H. R. Henderson & Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1955
  3. Home Mutual Fire Insurance v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Sun Life Assur. Co. of Canada v. CokerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  5. Tollett v. PHOENIX ASSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORKDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API