Legal Opinion
State v. Blum
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided June 19, 2018No. Docket: Yor–17–388PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGorman, J.
*568[¶ 1] The State of Maine appeals from a judgment of the trial court (York County, Cashman, J. ) granting Roy Blum's motion to dismiss the count against him alleging violation of a protective order (Class D), 19-A M.R.S. § 4011(1) (2017). The State contends that the court erred by concluding that the bail condition order prohibiting Blum from possessing a "dangerous weapon" issued by a New Hampshire bail commissioner is not a "similar order issued by a court ... of another state," pursuant to section 4011(1)(A), and therefore the State could not prosecute Blum for an alleged violation of that…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Callanan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Jordan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- James M. Dickau v. Vermont Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
- In Re Randy Scott B.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cassidy Holdings, LLC v. Aroostook County Commissioners et al.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2023
- Pat Doe v. Christopher Hills-PettittSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
- Pat Doe v. Sam RoeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2022
- State of Maine v. David T. BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
- State of Maine v. David T. BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019