Ortega-Candelaria v. Johnson & Johnson
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant Rolando Ortega-Candelaria (“Ortega”) appeals the district court’s dismissal of his claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461. Before the district court, Ortega sought judicial review of the decision to terminate payment of disability benefits to him under Johnson & Johnson’s Long-Term Disability Plan (the “Plan”). Ortega requested a judgment restoring his terminated benefits and ordering payment of past benefits. The district court dismissed Ortega’s claims with prejudice.
On appeal, Ortega argues…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Conkright v. FrommertSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Leahy v. Raytheon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Niebauer v. Crane & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- Dutkewych v. Standard Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- Santana-Diaz v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
- Ness v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2017
- Young v. Aetna Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.