Legal Opinion

Ortega-Candelaria v. Johnson & Johnson

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided June 16, 2014No. 13-1564PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellant Rolando Ortega-Candelaria (“Ortega”) appeals the district court’s dismissal of his claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461. Before the district court, Ortega sought judicial review of the decision to terminate payment of disability benefits to him under Johnson & Johnson’s Long-Term Disability Plan (the “Plan”). Ortega requested a judgment restoring his terminated benefits and ordering payment of past benefits. The district court dismissed Ortega’s claims with prejudice.

On appeal, Ortega argues…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Conkright v. FrommertSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Leahy v. Raytheon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Niebauer v. Crane & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  2. Dutkewych v. Standard Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  3. Santana-Diaz v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
  4. Ness v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2017
  5. Young v. Aetna Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API