Jones v. Shooshan
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LEONIE M. BRINKEMA, District Judge.
Before the Court is defendants’ motion to dismiss, in which they argue that all of the claims in this lawsuit are either time-barred or should be dismissed for failure to state a claim. For the reasons discussed below, defendants’ motion will be granted and this civil action will be dismissed with prejudice as to all defendants except William N. Demás, against whom only the fraud and fiduciary duty counts will go forward.
I. BACKGROUND
On October 21, 2011, plaintiff Stuart A. Jones filed a ten count complaint against five individual…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Edwin P. Harrison, and United States of America, Party in Interest v. Westinghouse Savannah River CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Detrick v. Panalpina, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Stack v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2013
- McPike v. Zero-Gravity Holdings, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2017
- Colgate v. Disthene Group, Inc.Buckingham County Circuit Court · 2013
- AV Automotive, L.L.C. v. Donald B. BavelyCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2025
- Bui Thi Bich Hong, et al. v. Mississippi Development Regional Center, LLC, et al.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2026
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.