Legal Opinion
Esparza v. Baker
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided July 10, 2019No. 6:17-cv-01163Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS STEPHANIE L. ESPARZA, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 17-1163-JTM-KGG REGENT INSURANCE COMPANY, Intervenor. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the court on intervenor Regent Insurance Company’s Motion to Exclude the Expert Economic Damages Opinion of Gary Baker, Ph.D. (Dkt. 79). Baker was retained by plaintiff to estimate the present value of plaintiff’s historic and future losses, including wages, employer benefits, and forgone household services. Regent does not challenge Baker’s qualifications as an economist, but argues his…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Gene S. Jacobsen, and Cross-Appellee v. Deseret Book Company, a Utah Corporation Dean Hughes, AndCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Woodworker's Supply, Inc. v. Principal Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Ralston v. Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.