Legal Opinion

Mollett v. United Benefit Life Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1972No. 42290PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNeill, J.

Plaintiff, as putative beneficiary, claims the proceeds of an insurance policy on the life of her former husband. The insured and plaintiff were divorced but the policy was not awarded to either party in the divorce decree. The insured husband had expressly waived his right to change the beneficiary, but in contravention of such waiver and failure to reserve the right to change beneficiaries, later executed and filed with defendant insurer a change of beneficiary designating his estate as beneficiary. Defendant paid the policy proceeds to the executrix of the insured’s estate.

The trial court…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Occidental Life Insurance v. PowersWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Towey v. Seattle-First National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Guarantee Loan & Trust Co. v. FayWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Findley v. FindleyWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. State Ex Rel. Van Moss v. SailorsWashington Supreme Court · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Allen v. AbrahamsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  2. In Re the Marriage of De CarteretCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  3. Estate of Madsen v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Estate of Madsen v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Michelman v. Lincoln National Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API