Legal Opinion

Syndicate Printing Co. v. Cashman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 20, 1911No. Nos. 17,443—(182)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Action in the district court, for JRamsey county to.enjoin defendants and their agents from procuring or permitting or contracting for the printing or publication of the Minnesota Farmers’ Institute Annual No. 24, save by plaintiff under its award and contract’ with the state printing commission. From an order, Hallara, J., denying plaintiff’s motion for a temporary injunction during’the pendency of the action, it appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBunn, J.

This action was brought to enjoin defendants, who are the members and. superintendent of the board of. administration of farmers’ institutes, from contracting.for the printing of the “Fanners’ Institute Annual.-”. . , :

The case came before the trial court on the application of plaintiff for a temporary injunction, and was heard upon the complaint and affidavits.- The trial court denied the application, and plaintiff appealed. . •

The.facts are as follows: Plaintiff holds a contract, made with *448the state printing commission, for the printing of the state comprised in class 3 of section 2267, R.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Village of Excelsior v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Foster v. NaftalinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  2. State v. HoltMontana Supreme Court · 1948
  3. In Re State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. State ex rel. Newman v. Pagels, Building InspectorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  5. State v. ZornMontana Supreme Court · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API