Legal Opinion
Levine v. Bayne, Snell & Krause, Ltd.
Texas Supreme Court
Decided April 5, 2001No. 99-0981Published
1Opinion of the Court 1
40 S.W.3d 92 (2001)
Ron LEVINE and Serena Levine, Petitioners,
v.
BAYNE, SNELL & KRAUSE, LTD., Respondent.
No. 99-0981.
Supreme Court of Texas.
Argued April 12, 2000.
Decided February 1, 2001.
Rehearing Overruled April 5, 2001.
Roger W. Hughes, Adams & Graham, Harlingen, Dana R. Allison, The Allison Law Firm, Brownsville, Thomas Clayton Hollis, Elms & Harmon, San Antonio, for Petitioners.
Barry Snell, Bayne Snell & Krause, San Antonio, Shephen E. McConnico, Jan M.N. Webre, Scott Douglass & McConnico, Austin, for Respondent.
2Opinion of the Court · EnochJustice Enoch
Ron and Serena Levine agreed to pay their lawyers one-third of "any amount…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited17 opinions
- Lopez v. Muñoz, Hockema & Reed, L.L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
- Benchmark Bank v. CrowderTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Bennett v. PotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Smith v. Levine, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1995
- Levine v. Bayne, Snell & Krause, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.