Legal Opinion

State v. Heisler

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1964No. 7896PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERNSTEIN, Justice.

Petitioner is an inmate of a federal penitentiary in the State of Washington. On May 10, 1962, he was nptified that a de-tainer had been placed against him by the Sheriff’s Department in Pima County, Arizona, charging him with passing two forged checks. On August 7, 1962, he filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus ad prose-quendum, and demanded a trial on the check charges. This writ was denied on December 18, 1962, and this appeal was taken.

The writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum, sought by petitioner is a little used common law writ which issues when it is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ponzi v. FessendenSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Carbo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. People v. PiscitelloNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
  4. People v. NewcombeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
  5. State v. DouglasArizona Supreme Court · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Lalla v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
  3. Richerson v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State v. CuzickCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  5. State v. KosturaArizona Supreme Court · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API